The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Impaired local intrinsic immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection in severe COVID-19
This article has 25 authors:Reviewed by Rapid Reviews Infectious Diseases, ScreenIT
-
Day-night and seasonal variation of human gene expression across tissues
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Negative consequences of failing to communicate uncertainties during a pandemic: an online randomised controlled trial on COVID-19 vaccines
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Outcomes of COVID-19 infection in patients treated with Clozapine
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Rotavirus as an Expression Platform of Domains of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Decreased neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 global variants by therapeutic anti-spike protein monoclonal antibodies
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Performance evaluation of the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
A human coronavirus evolves antigenically to escape antibody immunity
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by PREreview, ScreenIT, Review Commons
-
A combined strategy to detect plasma samples reliably with high anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titers in routine laboratories
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Development and validation of a clinical and genetic model for predicting risk of severe COVID-19
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT