The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Examining the role of COVID-19 testing availability on intention to isolate: A Randomized hypothetical scenario
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Comparison between one and two dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine prioritization for a fixed number of vaccine doses
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Isolation and Characterization of Cross-Neutralizing Coronavirus Antibodies from COVID-19+ Subjects
This article has 29 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Determinants of Time to Convalescence among COVID-19 Patients at Millennium COVID-19 Care Center in Ethiopia: A prospective cohort study
This article has 16 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
High titers and low fucosylation of early human anti–SARS-CoV-2 IgG promote inflammation by alveolar macrophages
This article has 36 authors:Reviewed by Rapid Reviews Infectious Diseases, ScreenIT, preLights
-
Visible and Real Sizes of New COVID-19 Pandemic Waves in Ukraine
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Do people reduce compliance with COVID-19 guidelines following vaccination? A longitudinal analysis of matched UK adults
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
INO-4800 DNA vaccine induces neutralizing antibodies and T cell activity against global SARS-CoV-2 variants
This article has 24 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Glycyrrhizin Effectively Inhibits SARS-CoV-2 Replication by Inhibiting the Viral Main Protease
This article has 11 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Validity of markers and indexes of systemic inflammation in predicting mortality in COVID 19 infection : A hospital based cross sectional study
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT