The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Impact of cobas PCR Media freezing on SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA integrity and whole genome sequencing analyses
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants by molecular-clamping technology-based RT-qPCR
This article has 18 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Immune Correlates of Protection by mRNA-1273 Immunization against SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Nonhuman Primates
This article has 64 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Estimation of local time-varying reproduction numbers in noisy surveillance data
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Sialic acid-containing glycolipids mediate binding and viral entry of SARS-CoV-2
This article has 24 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Association between comorbidities and death from COVID-19 in different age groups
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
High-resolution epigenome analysis in nasal samples derived from children with respiratory viral infections reveals striking changes upon SARS-CoV-2 infection
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Breaking down of healthcare system: Mathematical modelling for controlling the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak in Wuhan, China
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Accessibility, inclusivity, and implementation of COVID-19 clinical management guidelines early in the pandemic: a global survey
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Complexity in SARS-CoV-2 genome data: Price theory of mutant isolates
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT