The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on anxiety and depression symptoms of young people in the global south: evidence from a four-country cohort study
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Sofosbuvir terminated RNA is more resistant to SARS-CoV-2 proofreader than RNA terminated by Remdesivir
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Tamil Nadu in October-November 2020
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Profiling SARS-CoV-2 mutation fingerprints that range from the viral pangenome to individual infection quasispecies
This article has 11 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Association between living with children and outcomes from covid-19: OpenSAFELY cohort study of 12 million adults in England
This article has 35 authors: -
How lifestyle changes within the COVID-19 global pandemic have affected the pattern and symptoms of the menstrual cycle
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Seroprevalence of Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in US Blood Donors
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Genetic variants mimicking therapeutic inhibition of IL-6 receptor signaling and risk of COVID-19
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Small molecules inhibit SARS-COV-2 induced aberrant inflammation and viral replication in mice by targeting S100A8/A9-TLR4 axis
This article has 18 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Learning as We Go: An Examination of the Statistical Accuracy of COVID19 Daily Death Count Predictions
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT