The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
A Human-Pathogen Model for COVID-19 Outbreak: Flattening Epidemic Curve in Kenya
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Independent association of meteorological characteristics with initial spread of Covid-19 in India
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
KG-COVID-19: A Framework to Produce Customized Knowledge Graphs for COVID-19 Response
This article has 18 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Sequencing Data of North American SARS-CoV-2 Isolates Shows Widespread Complex Variants
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Innate Immune Response Modulation and Resistance to SARS-CoV-2 infection: A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study in High Risk Healthcare Workers
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Use of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Serum Peptidome to Classify and Predict Coronavirus Disease 2019 Severity
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Dynamic Change of COVID-19 Seroprevalence among Asymptomatic Population in Tokyo during the Second Wave
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Years of life lost due to the psychosocial consequences of COVID19 mitigation strategies based on Swiss data
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Features of creatine-kinase in COVID-19 patients within various specific periods: A cohort study
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Ventilation and the SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT