The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Organisms causing secondary pneumonias in COVID-19 patients at 5 UK ICUs as detected with the FilmArray test
This article has 20 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Association of University Reopening Policies with New Confirmed COVID-19 Cases in the United States
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Renal Involvement in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia and Outcomes After Stem Cell Nebulization
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Feasibility of Controlling COVID-19 Outbreaks in the UK by Rolling Interventions
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 during the first year of the pandemic in the Bronx enabled clinical and epidemiological inference
This article has 24 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Using the LIST model to Estimate the Effects of Contact Tracing on COVID-19 Endemic Equilibria in England and its Regions
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Let the DOCTOR Decide Whom to Test: Adaptive Testing Strategies to Tackle the COVID-19 Pandemic
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Adherence to the test, trace, and isolate system in the UK: results from 37 nationally representative surveys
This article has 6 authors: -
SARS-CoV-2 engages inflammasome and pyroptosis in human primary monocytes
This article has 19 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Community structured model for vaccine strategies to control COVID19 spread: A mathematical study
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT