ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
SARS-CoV2 infection in farmed mink, Netherlands, April 2020
This article has 19 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Controlling the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein conformation
This article has 13 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Immunologic perturbations in severe COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 infection
This article has 31 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Behavioral Change Towards Reduced Intensity Physical Activity Is Disproportionately Prevalent Among Adults With Serious Health Issues or Self-Perception of High Risk During the UK COVID-19 Lockdown
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Empirical Model of Spring 2020 Decrease in Daily Confirmed COVID-19 Cases in King County, Washington
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Patterns of COVID-19 testing and mortality by race and ethnicity among United States veterans: A nationwide cohort study
This article has 16 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
When Second Best Might Be the Best: Using Hospitalization Data to Monitor the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Pandemic velocity: Forecasting COVID-19 in the US with a machine learning & Bayesian time series compartmental model
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
An SEIARD epidemic model for COVID-19 in Mexico: Mathematical analysis and state-level forecast
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Analytical performance of lateral flow immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 exposure screening on venous and capillary blood samples
This article has 16 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT