The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Seroprevalence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study
This article has 39 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
An agent-based model of spread of a pandemic with validation using COVID-19 data from New York State
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
A Heuristic Model for Spreading of COVID 19 in Singapore
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Vinegar and its active component acetic acid inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro and ex vivo
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
COVID-19 Medical Vulnerability Indicators: A Predictive, Local Data Model for Equity in Public Health Decision Making
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Correlation of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Antigen and RNA Concentrations in Nasopharyngeal Samples from Children and Adults Using an Ultrasensitive and Quantitative Antigen Assay
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Hospitalisations for emergency-sensitive conditions in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from the German-wide Helios hospital network
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
SARS-CoV-2 Causes Severe Epithelial Inflammation and Barrier Dysfunction
This article has 20 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Laboratory-Developed Test for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva Samples at the University of California, Riverside
This article has 11 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Mass molecular testing for COVID19 using NGS-based technology and a highly scalable workflow
This article has 15 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT