SARS-CoV-2 Causes Severe Epithelial Inflammation and Barrier Dysfunction
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
- @AilisDr's saved articles (AilisDr)
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 challenges health care systems and societies worldwide in unprecedented ways. Although numerous new studies have been conducted, research to better understand the molecular pathogen-host interactions are urgently needed.
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.08.31.276725: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources ) IgG monoclonal, primary antibodies and AlexaFluor® goat anti-mouse IgG polyclonal antibodies (Dianova; # 115-545-146). anti-mouse IgGsuggested: (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat# 115-545-146, RRID:AB_2307324)Rabbit anti-E-cadherin IgG monoclonal (CellSignaling; 3195S) or rabbit anti-VE-cadherin polyclonal, primary antibodies (CellSignaling; 2158S) and Cy5 goat anti-mouse IgG polyclonal antibodies (Dianova; #111-175-144) were used to detect cell borders of … SciScore for 10.1101/2020.08.31.276725: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources ) IgG monoclonal, primary antibodies and AlexaFluor® goat anti-mouse IgG polyclonal antibodies (Dianova; # 115-545-146). anti-mouse IgGsuggested: (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat# 115-545-146, RRID:AB_2307324)Rabbit anti-E-cadherin IgG monoclonal (CellSignaling; 3195S) or rabbit anti-VE-cadherin polyclonal, primary antibodies (CellSignaling; 2158S) and Cy5 goat anti-mouse IgG polyclonal antibodies (Dianova; #111-175-144) were used to detect cell borders of Calu-3 or HUVEC cells on the membrane of the alveolus-on-a-chip model, respectively. anti-E-cadherin IgGsuggested: Noneanti-VE-cadherinsuggested: (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 2158, RRID:AB_2077970)For the detection of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein a rabbit polyclonal anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike S2 antibody (Sino Biological #40590-T62) was used. anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike S2suggested: (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# PA5-112048, RRID:AB_2866784)Experimental Models: Cell Lines Sentences Resources For the cultivation of the human alveolus-on-a-chip model we used Calu-3 cells and macrophages at the epithelial side, and HUVECs at the endothelial side. HUVECssuggested: NoneFor infection of Vero-76 or Calu-3 cells, cells were washed with PBS and either left uninfected (mock) or infected with SARS-CoV-2 with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 for 120 min in medium (EMEM with HEPES modification and 5 mM L-Glutamine for Vero-76 cells and RPMI 1640 for Calu-3 cells) supplemented with 10 % FCS. Vero-76suggested: NoneCalu-3suggested: NoneRabbit anti-E-cadherin IgG monoclonal (CellSignaling; 3195S) or rabbit anti-VE-cadherin polyclonal, primary antibodies (CellSignaling; 2158S) and Cy5 goat anti-mouse IgG polyclonal antibodies (Dianova; #111-175-144) were used to detect cell borders of Calu-3 or HUVEC cells on the membrane of the alveolus-on-a-chip model, respectively. HUVECsuggested: KCB Cat# KCB 200648YJ, RRID:CVCL_2959)Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources The cDNA preparation was performed using the SuperScript IV (Thermofisher), followed by a multiplex PCR to generate overlapping 400 nt amplicons using version 3 of the primer set (https://github.com/artic-network/artic-ncov2019/tree/master/primer_schemes/nCoV-2019/V3). Thermofishersuggested: (ThermoFisher; SL 8; Centrifuge, RRID:SCR_020809)Infection by SARS-CoV-2 was visualized using mouse anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (GeneTex; #GTX632604 GeneTexsuggested: (GeneTex, RRID:SCR_000069)Images were acquired using an Axio Observer.Z1 microscope (Zeiss) with Plan Apochromat 20x/0.8 objective (Zeiss), ApoTome.2 (Zeiss) and Axiocam 503 mono (Zeiss) and the software Zen 2.6 (blue edition; Zeiss). Zensuggested: NoneFiji V 1.52b (ImageJ) was used for further image processing, including Z-stack merging with maximum intensity projection and gamma correction. Fijisuggested: (Fiji, RRID:SCR_002285)ImageJsuggested: (ImageJ, RRID:SCR_003070)Statistical analysis: Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 8 (GraphPad Software). GraphPadsuggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- No conflict of interest statement was detected. If there are no conflicts, we encourage authors to explicit state so.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-