The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Excess mortality for care home residents during the first 23 weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a national cohort study
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Clinical Characteristics and Severity of COVID-19 Disease in Patients from Boston Area Hospitals
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Colchicine use in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
This article has 11 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
How many COVID-19 cases could have been prevented in the US if its interventions were as effective as those in China and South Korea?
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Neuropilin-1 assists SARS-CoV-2 infection by stimulating the separation of Spike protein S1 and S2
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Mutational analysis unveils the temporal and spatial distribution of G614 genotype of SARS-CoV-2in different Indian states and its association with case fatality rate of COVID-19
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Publication practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Biomedical preprints and peer-reviewed literature
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Impact of systemic corticosteroids on hospitalized patients with COVID-19: January 2021 Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
COVID-19’s U.S. Temperature Response Profile
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Cold sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike ectodomain
This article has 23 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT