The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
The experiences and needs of re-entering nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Determining the period of communicability of SARS-CoV-2: A rapid review of the literature
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Sensitivity Analysis on Predictive Capability of SIRD Model for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Decreased plasma levels of the survival factor renalase are associated with worse outcomes in COVID-19
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Conspiracy Beliefs Are Associated with Lower Knowledge and Higher Anxiety Levels Regarding COVID-19 among Students at the University of Jordan
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Ethnic differences in alpha‐1 antitrypsin deficiency allele frequencies may partially explain national differences in COVID‐19 fatality rates
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Ascertainment rate of SARS-CoV-2 infections from healthcare and community testing in the UK
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Response strategies for COVID-19 epidemics in African settings: a mathematical modelling study
This article has 47 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Effects of tocilizumab on mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a multicentre cohort study
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Using Machine Learning Algorithms to Develop a Clinical Decision-Making Tool for COVID-19 Inpatients
This article has 16 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT