The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Population Data-Driven Formulation of a COVID-19 Therapeutic
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Frequency and profile of objective cognitive deficits in hospitalized patients recovering from COVID-19
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Relative Humidity Predicts Day-to-Day Variations in COVID-19 Cases in the City of Buenos Aires
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Identification of B.1.346 lineage of SARS-CoV-2 in Japan: Genomic evidence of re-entry of Clade 20C
This article has 29 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Predicting prognosis in COVID-19 patients using machine learning and readily available clinical data
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Dynamic competition between SARS-CoV-2 NSP1 and mRNA on the human ribosome inhibits translation initiation
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Long-chain polyphosphates impair SARS-CoV-2 infection and replication
This article has 35 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
COVID‐19 critical illness pathophysiology driven by diffuse pulmonary thrombi and pulmonary endothelial dysfunction responsive to thrombolysis
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Using COVID-19 deaths as a surrogate to measure the progression of the pandemics
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Subjective Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Schizotypy and General Mental Health in Germany and the United Kingdom, for Independent Samples in May and in October 2020
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT