ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Evidence of the effectiveness of travel-related measures during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid systematic review
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Modelling the impact of travel restrictions on COVID-19 cases in Newfoundland and Labrador
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to guide vaccination strategy in an urban area
This article has 31 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Predicting COVID19 Critical Care Beds - The London North-West University Healthcare Trust Experience
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Using an Ecological and Biological Framing for an Anti-racist Covid-19 Approach
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 cases in non-Italian nationals notified to the Italian surveillance system
This article has 20 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Modeling Contact Tracing Strategies for COVID-19 in the Context of Relaxed Physical Distancing Measures
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Corticosteroid Use in Severely Hypoxemic COVID-19 Patients: An Observational Cohort Analysis of Dosing Patterns and Outcomes in the Early Phase of the Pandemic
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Mining Twitter Data on COVID-19 for Sentiment analysis and frequent patterns Discovery
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
End-to-End Protocol for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Built Environments
This article has 17 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT