ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Epidemiology of sleep disorders during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic scoping review protocol
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
COVID-19 in China: Risk Factors and R0 Revisited
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Added value of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing in a Flemish nursing home during an acute COVID-19 outbreak in April 2020
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Prevalence Threshold and Temporal Interpretation of Screening Tests: The Example of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Pandemic
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Unique inflammatory profile is associated with higher SARS-CoV-2 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) mortality
This article has 14 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
A DISSYMMETRY IN THE FIGURES RELATED TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN THE WORLD: WHAT FACTORS EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AFRICA AND THE REST OF THE WORLD?
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Identification of Risk Factors and Symptoms of COVID-19: Analysis of Biomedical Literature and Social Media Data
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Erythrocytes identify complement activation in patients with COVID-19
This article has 15 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Do COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU require anti-Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis?
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Comorbidities, clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory findings, imaging features, treatment strategies, and outcomes in adult and pediatric patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
This article has 11 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT