ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
COVID-19 infection and outcomes in a population-based cohort of 17 203 adults with intellectual disabilities compared with the general population
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Rapid vaccination and partial lockdown minimize 4th waves from emerging highly contagious SARS-CoV-2 variants
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Community use of face masks and similar barriers to prevent respiratory illness such as COVID-19: a rapid scoping review
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Face coverings and respiratory tract droplet dispersion
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Coronavirus-related online web search desire amidst the rising novel coronavirus incidence in Ethiopia: Google Trends-based infodemiology
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Identification of high-risk COVID-19 patients using machine learning
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Understanding COVID‐19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Genomic heterogeneity and clinical characterization of SARS-CoV-2 in Oregon
This article has 14 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Community factors and excess mortality in first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in England
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Case- fatality rate in COVID- 19 patients: A meta- analysis of publicly accessible database
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT