ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Neighborhood-Level Public Facilities and COVID-19 Transmission: A Nationwide Geospatial Study In China
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
The SARS-CoV-2 Spike variant D614G favors an open conformational state
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
COVID-19 Misinformation Trends in Australia: Prospective Longitudinal National Survey
This article has 13 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Exploring surveillance data biases when estimating the reproduction number: with insights into subpopulation transmission of COVID-19 in England
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Correlation between daily infections and fatality rate due to Covid-19 in Germany
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Neonatal hyperoxia enhances age-dependent expression of SARS-CoV-2 receptors in mice
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Panbio™ rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 has acceptable accuracy in symptomatic patients in primary health care
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Long period dynamics of viral load and antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 infection: an observational cohort study
This article has 17 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Mitigation policies and vaccination in the COVID-19 pandemic: a modelling study
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
A prospect on the use of antiviral drugs to control local outbreaks of COVID-19
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT