ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Comparative structural analyses of selected spike protein-RBD mutations in SARS-CoV-2 lineages
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Report on Three Round COVID-19 Risk Blind Tests by Screening Eye-region Manifestations
This article has 17 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Predicting the mutational drivers of future SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern
This article has 16 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Association between SARS-Cov-2 infection during pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A re-analysis of the data reported by Wei et al. (2021)
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Recovery from Covid-19 critical illness: A secondary analysis of the ISARIC4C CCP-UK cohort study and the RECOVER trial
This article has 12 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Modeling the Waves of Covid-19
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Structural basis for the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 virulence factor nsp1 with Pol α - Primase
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
AZD1222/ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination induces a polyfunctional spike protein–specific T H 1 response with a diverse TCR repertoire
This article has 13 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Burden of COVID-19 and case fatality rate in Pune, India: an analysis of the first and second wave of the pandemic
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Predicting gene regulatory networks from multi-omics to link genetic risk variants and neuroimmunology to Alzheimer’s disease phenotypes
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT