ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Dynamics of COVID-19 pandemic in India and Pakistan: A metapopulation modelling approach
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Recognising and bearing the burden of long COVID-related disability
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Epidemiological characteristics of the B.1.526 SARS-CoV-2 variant
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Modelling the effectiveness and social costs of daily lateral flow antigen tests versus quarantine in preventing onward transmission of COVID-19 from traced contacts
This article has 14 authors:Reviewed by Rapid Reviews Infectious Diseases, ScreenIT
-
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 breakthrough infections among vaccinated patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases
This article has 12 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Helmet noninvasive ventilation for COVID-19 patients “Helmet-COVID”: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
This article has 34 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 tracking of variants Delta, Delta plus, Kappa and Beta in wastewater by allele-specific RT-qPCR
This article has 14 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
RETRACTED: Analysis of 329,942 SARS-CoV-2 records retrieved from GISAID database
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Administration of aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 to K18-hACE2 mice uncouples respiratory infection from fatal neuroinvasion
This article has 22 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Impact of the First COVID Lockdown on Accident- and Injury-Related Pediatric Intensive Care Admissions in Germany—A Multicenter Study
This article has 45 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT