Menstrual symptoms and infertility odds among individuals with co-occurring endometriosis and polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective

To study the prevalence of co-occurring endometriosis and polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS), estimate infertility odds, and characterize menstrual symptom profiles associated with this combined phenotype in a population cohort.

Design

Prospective digital cohort in the United States (US).

Subjects

90,714 consented participants enrolled between November 2019 and June 2025 who completed relevant surveys; a subset of 25,152 participants with menstrual cycle logs linked to monthly surveys contributed to symptom analyses.

Exposure

Participants were classified by self-reported physician diagnosis into four groups: endometriosis alone, PMOS alone, co-occurring endometriosis and PMOS (endometriosis+PMOS), or neither condition (reference group).

Main Outcome Measures

(1) Odds of self-reported physician-diagnosed infertility (ever/never, cross-sectional), estimated using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, and subjective socioeconomic status; (2) number of adverse menstrual symptoms logged per cycle, assessed using negative binomial mixed-effects models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, and hormonal contraceptive use.

Results

Among 90,714 participants, the mean age was 35.1 years (standard deviation: 11.6) and the majority identified as non-Hispanic White (72%). Prevalence estimates were 11% for PMOS alone, 6% for endometriosis alone, and 2% for endometriosis+PMOS. Individuals with endometriosis+PMOS more frequently reported unemployment, low socioeconomic status, active smoking, poorer subjective health, early menarche, current irregular cycles, and a broad range of comorbidities. Infertility odds were highest for endometriosis+PMOS (odds ratio: 12.49 [95% confidence interval: 11.13–13.99]), followed by PMOS alone (6.12 [5.69–6.59]) and endometriosis alone (4.31 [3.93–4.72]), with the combined effect exceeding additive expectations (relative excess risk due to interaction: 3.05 [1.65–4.46]). Individuals with endometriosis+PMOS logged 11% more symptoms per cycle than those with neither condition (incidence rate ratio: 1.11 [1.04–1.19]) and had the highest odds of logging pelvic pain, fatigue, and sleep changes, among other symptoms.

Conclusion

In this large US digital cohort, co-occurring endometriosis and PMOS affected 1 in 50 participants and was associated with markedly elevated infertility odds exceeding additive expectations, and a heightened menstrual symptom burden. Several risk factors and health impacts characteristic of each condition appeared amplified in individuals with both conditions, suggesting a subgroup with compounded clinical complexity and greater care needs.

Article activity feed