From Anatomy to Aneurysm: Morphological-Hemodynamic Coupling and Predictive Modeling in Aberrant Splenic Artery

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Aberrant splenic artery (SA) is an extremely rare anatomical variant in which the SA arises from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) rather than the celiac axis. Individuals with this anatomical variant are at markedly increased risk of developing SA aneurysms (SAAs). However, no systematic investigation into its underlying pathogenesis has been conducted to date, nor has a pathogenesis-based predictive model been developed to assess future aneurysm risk in this population.

Objectives

This study aimed to systematically investigate the morphological and hemodynamic mechanisms by which aberrant SA anatomy predisposes to local SAA formation, and to develop an interpretable predictive model for individualized risk stratification based on these mechanisms.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective cohort study enrolled 195 patients with aberrant SA from 16 centers across China between January 2008 and June 2026, including 94 with concomitant aberrant SAAs and 101 without. 3D vascular models were reconstructed from CTA images, and 12 morphological parameters were measured. Computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed to analyze 14 hemodynamic parameters. Ultimately, 5 morphological parameters were selected to construct a two-stage interpretable machine learning model for predicting the occurrence and location of SAAs.

Results

Morphologically, aberrant SAAs were significantly larger (diameter: 20.4mm vs. 17.5mm, P <0.001; length: 20.5mm vs. 17.9mm, P =0.002) and predominantly located in the proximal SA, whereas common SAAs were mainly located in the distal splenic hilum. Furthermore, the aberrant SA exhibited a smaller branching angle with its parent vessel (22.3° vs. 19.7°, P =0.010), an increased SA-to-SMA cross-sectional area ratio (0.57 vs. 0.47, P =0.008), and a higher tortuosity index ( P <0.001). Hemodynamic analysis demonstrated significantly lower TAWSS at the proximal SA in aberrant anatomy ( P <0.001), whereas the OSI at the SA-parent vessel junction was significantly elevated ( P =0.004) and inversely correlated with the branching angle ( P <0.001, r=-0.686). The interpretable machine learning model, built on morphological and hemodynamic principles, achieved an AUROC of 0.828 for predicting aberrant SAA occurrence and was deployed as an interactive web application (the zs_abeSA model) for clinical use.

Conclusions

Aberrant SA anatomy is an independent risk factor for SAA formation. The pathogenic mechanism involves a cascade from morphological remodeling to hemodynamic derangement, ultimately leading to aneurysm formation at the proximal SA. The zs_abeSA model provides a practical tool for individualized risk assessment, with direct implications for early screening and surveillance strategy development.

Article activity feed