Initial Staging 18 F-FDG PET/CT for Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring to Assess Cardiovascular Risk in Women with Breast Cancer
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background.
Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death among women with breast cancer, and the 2026 ACC/AHA dyslipidemia guideline endorses coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring to guide statin therapy before cardiotoxic treatment. Breast cancer patients routinely undergo staging 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, whose low- dose CT visualizes the coronary arteries, thus enabling CAC quantification at no additional cost or radiation.
Methods
In this single-center retrospective study, consecutive women with newly diagnosed breast cancer undergoing staging 18 F-FDG PET/CT (2009–2021) had semi- automated Agatston CAC scoring performed on the low-dose CT and were stratified by CAC presence (CAC-P) versus absence (CAC-A). We assessed a composite of cardiac diagnostic testing (stress testing, coronary CT angiography, invasive angiography), clinical events, and reclassification of statin eligibility per ACC/AHA guideline thresholds in a prevention-eligible subgroup.
Results
Among 276 women (mean age 55.5 years; median follow-up 7.1 years), CAC was present in 68 (25%) but was clinically reported in only 5.4%. CAC-P was associated with more cardiac testing (34% vs 12%; age-adjusted hazard ratio 2.75, 95% CI 1.43–5.28) and, though underpowered, with more atherosclerotic events (7.4% vs 1.4%), but not with the all-cause composite. In the prevention-eligible subgroup (n=39), CAC scoring would have changed statin eligibility in 64%, initiating therapy in 62% of CAC-P women and supporting de-prescribing in 67% of CAC-A women.
Conclusions
CAC can be feasibly quantified from staging PET/CT in women with breast cancer and would frequently reclassify statin eligibility at no additional cost or radiation, yet is rarely reported.
