Persistent Neurological Symptoms After COVID-19 Lack Evidence of Adaptive CNS Immune Activation

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Persistent neurological symptoms are among the most disabling manifestations of post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS), yet the contribution of ongoing CNS immune activation remains uncertain. CSF studies including clinically relevant COVID-19 recovered control cohorts are scarce. In this prospective single-center study, we enrolled 50 patients fulfilling the WHO criteria for PCS (COVIDpost, mean age +/- standard deviation [SD] 43.41 +/- 11.99 years, 30 % male, 70 % female) and 50 individuals who had fully recovered from COVID-19 (COVIDreco, mean age +/- SD 39.38 +/- 13.45, 42 % male, 58 % female). Both cohorts were comparable regarding age (p = 0.07), sex (p = 0.30), and education (p = 0.84). All participants underwent paired CSF and serum analyses together with comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. Routine CSF parameters, blood-CSF barrier integrity, oligoclonal bands (OCB), SARS-CoV-2 RNA in CSF and blood, pathogen-specific antibody indices, and neuronal autoantibodies were investigated. Despite marked differences in cognitive performance (p < 0.001) and fatigue severity (p < 0.001), patients with PCS showed no evidence of disease-specific CSF abnormalities compared to recovered controls. Routine CSF parameters, blood-CSF barrier dysfunction, CSF-restricted OCB, SARS-CoV-2 RNA in CSF and blood, intrathecal SARS-CoV-2 antibody synthesis, polyspecific antiviral immune responses, and neuronal autoantibodies were comparable between groups. SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG concentrations in CSF correlated positively with serum concentrations (COVIDpost: r [95%CI] = 0.78 [0.62 - 0.87]; COVIDreco: r [95%CI] = 0.86 [0.75 - 0.92]; both p < 0.001) and albumin quotient (COVIDpost: r [95%CI] = 0.52 [0.26 - 0.71], p < 0.001; COVIDreco: r [95%CI] = 0.37 [0.10 - 0.60]; p = 0.01), consistent with passive transfer across the blood-CSF barrier rather than compartmentalized intrathecal immune activation. Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody measures were not associated with cognitive performance (p > 0.72) or fatigue severity (p > 0.88). This study provides no evidence that persistent neurological symptoms after COVID-19 are accompanied by ongoing adaptive CNS immune activation, disease-specific neuronal autoimmunity, or intrathecal SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral immune responses. The inclusion of a carefully phenotyped COVID-19 recovered comparison cohort strengthens the conclusion that routine CSF abnormalities largely do not seem to reflect mechanisms specific to PCS. These findings argue against routine CSF diagnostics as a source of disease-specific biomarkers in unselected PCS patients and support future studies focusing on alternative mechanisms underlying persistent neurological symptoms.

Article activity feed