Minimal measurement strategies for cardiometabolic risk classification within the Positive Health framework: A cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 1999–2004 data
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Large-scale prevention and population health monitoring require measurement approaches that are both feasible and informative. Although several self-measurable anthropometric and fitness indicators have been associated with cardiometabolic risk, it remains unclear whether combining multiple measurements provides meaningful improvements over simpler approaches. We evaluated whether a parsimonious set of self-measurable indicators can achieve classification performance comparable to a full candidate set and quantified the incremental value of additional measurements.
Methods
Using data from 8,275 adults in the NHANES 1999–2004 cohorts, we evaluated a predefined minimal set of four self measurable anthropometric and fitness indicators (body mass index (BMI), waist to height ratio (WHtR), mid upper arm circumference (MUAC), and VO2max (as a proxy for the 6 minute walk test) as candidate indicators of cardiometabolic risk. Their ability to reflect underlying clinical risk factors related to adiposity, glucose and lipid metabolism, and physical fitness was assessed using nested logistic regression models, likelihood ratio tests, discrimination metrics, and decision tree analyses.
Results
WHtR consistently showed the strongest discriminative performance, with ΔPR-AUC values for BMI versus WHtR ranging from -0.002 to -0.037, and emerged as the primary splitting variable. Adding BMI to WHtR resulted in small gains in PR-AUC for most outcomes, ranging from 0.000 to 0.008, except for triglycerides where the gain was larger (ΔPR-AUC=0.039). Further inclusion of MUAC and VO2max provided limited additional value overall, with evidence of variation across outcomes and sex stratified analyses.
Conclusion
Most classification performance was achieved using a limited number of simple self-measurable indicators, with little additional benefit from incorporating further measurements. These findings suggest that parsimonious measurement strategies may provide a feasible approach for cardiometabolic risk classification in population health and prevention settings while reducing measurement burden.
Key Messages
What is already known on this topic
-
Multiple anthropometric indicators have been associated with cardiometabolic risk
-
It remains unclear which indicator or which combination of indicators provide meaningful improvements in risk classification
What this study adds
-
In this study we systematically evaluate the incremental value of BMI, WHtR, MUAC and VO2max to quantify their incremental contribution to classification of multiple cardiometabolic outcomes
-
WHtR consistently showed the strongest classification performance, while additional measurements provided limited benefit
How this study might affect research, practice or policy
-
This study suggests that a parsimonious measurement strategy may be sufficient for classification of cardiometabolic risk
-
Simpler, resource-efficient measurement strategies could alleviate measurement burden while maintaining risk classification