A practical evaluation of sampling filtration and preservation of environmental DNA samples for the water column monitoring

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Offshore industry still largely relies on traditional approaches for regulatory compliance to environmental impact on the water column. Implementing environmental DNA (eDNA) workflow can offer several advantages, but early stages such as sampling and conservation of the samples require standardization and simplification before they can be routinely applied in offshore monitoring programs. In this study, we assessed the effect of several filter types (Durapore disc, Sterivex capsule and Wattera high-capacity capsule; all with 0.22 µm pore size) allowing for different volume of filtration used for sampling eDNA. We also evaluated the effect of 25 days conservation of unfiltered water samples with different preservative solutions (Benzalkonium chloride -BAC, Longmire’s solution LONGI and a modified Longmire’s solution without SDS, LNoSDS) as a viable option when immediate filtration and cold storage are not possible. For downstream eDNA evaluation of filter types and preservation, we used quantitative digital PCR on selected target DNA and metabarcoding for qualitative assessment of marine prokaryotic and eukaryotic communities. Overall, filter choice had relatively less effects on quantitative and qualitative information from eDNA compared with water preservation. Sterivex and Durapore were better filter choices for biodiversity assessment. While the Wattera filter allowed processing of larger water volumes and improved quantification of metazoan DNA, handling and processing were more challenging. For water conservation, LNoSDS was the best option. Chemical agents of LONGI and BAC may provide favourable substrates for some tolerant bacterial strains, altering the microbial community composition, with consequences for the overall qualitative evaluation of conserved eDNA. For targeted metazoan eDNA, however, chemical preservation showed clear benefits. This research highlights key considerations and viable options for eDNA sampling and simple preservation workflows without cold storage for implementation in offshore water column monitoring.

Highlights

  • Need for standardization of eDNA workflow for offshore water column monitoring

  • Importance of eDNA sampling (filters) and eDNA conservation (preservatives)

  • Filter choice does not affect drastically the dominant eDNA communities

  • Conservation outside cold storage challenging for eDNA-based biodiversity evaluation

  • Viable options: Sterivex filter for sampling; Longmire’s (no SDS) for conservation

Article activity feed