A mixed-methods study comparing digitized versus paper-based tools during the provision of sexual and reproductive health services for young women in Ethiopia
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in Ethiopia face persistent barriers to accessing quality sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, including limited information, stigma, and lack of youth-responsive care. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of digitized versus paper-based counselling tools within an intervention designed to address behavioral and structural barriers contributing to low contraceptive use among AGYW, by reframing contraception as a tool to achieve their life goals.
The study employed a cross-sectional mixed-methods design, including client exit interviews with 302 AGYW, key informant interviews with 18 Health Extension Workers (HEWs), secondary analysis of service delivery data from DHIS2, and costing data from program records. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed. Digital counselling was significantly associated with higher MII Plus scores (93% vs. 73.8%, p=0.001), client knowledge of side effects, and confidence in discussing and managing contraception. Clients rated paper-based tools as easier to understand, but digital tools enhanced comprehension, goal-setting, and integration of financial planning and reproductive health concepts. HEWs reported improved consistency in counselling, better referrals, and operational efficiencies with digital tools. Challenges included device glitches, limited connectivity, and variable digital literacy, often requiring concurrent use of paper and digital tools.
This study shows that transitioning from paper-based to digital counselling tools improved service quality, client engagement, and informed contraceptive decision-making. Higher MII Plus scores and positive client experiences indicate more standardized, participatory, and respectful counselling. Providers reported operational benefits, including easier counselling and improved data management, though productivity gains were limited. Implementation challenges highlight the need for context-sensitive strategies, ongoing training, and supportive supervision during digital integration. Importantly, the findings suggest that digital tools can improve how services are delivered (quality and consistency), even when service volume remains stable.
AUTHOR SUMMARY
This study looked at how to improve access to family planning services for adolescent girls and young women in Ethiopia, who often face stigma, lack of information, and unfriendly healthcare services. We compared two ways of providing family planning counselling: a traditional paper-based guide and a digital tool (implemented on a tablet or phone). We gathered information from over 300 young women and healthcare workers and analyzed service records to compare differences between the two approaches. We found that the digital tool resulted in improved quality of counselling. Young women better understood their contraceptive options, including side effects, and felt more confident making decisions. The digital tool also helped to better connect family planning to personal goals, like education or financial planning. However, many participants found the paper tool easier to follow. Healthcare workers reported that the digital tool made their work more consistent and efficient, but they also faced problems like poor internet, device malfunctions, and varying comfort with technology. Sometimes they had to use both the digital and paper tool together. Overall, the digital tool showed clear benefits, but challenges mean they should be introduced carefully, with proper training and support to ensure they work effectively in real-world settings.
