Access to Sexual and Reproductive Health Education and Services Among Deaf Adolescents in Wakiso District, Uganda: A Mixed-Methods Cross-Sectional Study
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Persons with disabilities, particularly deaf individuals, remain a largely overlooked population in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) programming globally, with this gap especially pronounced in low- and middle-income countries. Deafness imposes substantial barriers to accessing information and services that are routinely available to hearing peers, further exacerbated in the post-COVID-19 era. This study assessed deaf adolescents’ knowledge of and access to SRH education and services in Wakiso District, Uganda, and explored systemic, institutional, community, and adolescent-level factors shaping access.
Methods
A mixed-methods cross-sectional study was conducted at Wakiso Secondary School for the Deaf from July 2022 to January 2023. Quantitative data were collected from 70 consecutively sampled deaf adolescents aged 13–19 years using a structured questionnaire. Qualitative data were gathered through key informant interviews (KIIs) with four purposively selected stakeholders and a focus group discussion (FGD) with deaf adolescent students. Qualitative data were analysed thematically.
Results
The mean participant age was 17 years (SD ±1.8); 65.7% were female. A large majority (88.6%) had heard of SRH components, and 98.6% perceived a need for SRH education or services. However, 84.3% reported challenges accessing these services at least 85% of the time. No participant had ever received SRH education or services through a formal health facility. The FGD revealed that adolescents’ conceptualisation of SRH was narrow, centred on body hygiene and HIV prevention, while service-seeking was reactive and symptom-driven. Five cross-cutting themes emerged from the KIIs and were reinforced by FGD findings: communication barriers; inadequate and inaccessible services; family and community isolation; existing platforms and positive practices; and negative provider attitudes and limited capacity. The school nurse emerged as the sole functional SRH access point for most participants.
Conclusion
Despite high awareness and near-universal perceived need, deaf adolescents in Uganda face profound multilevel barriers to SRH access. Structural, psychosocial, and knowledge-related barriers interact to exclude this population from formal health services. Findings call for disability-responsive SRH integration into health systems, training of health workers in accessible communication, community capacity building, and co-design of SRH programmes with deaf adolescents.
