The centrality of ecotones: How scale, sex, and ontogeny shape the spatial ecology of a solitary carnivore
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Context
Animals balance resource acquisition with risk mitigation. These trade-offs are rarely uniform, being mediated by spatial scale, demographic traits, and environmental constraints. Understanding these divergent spatial behaviors is critical for management across human-dominated landscapes.
Objectives
We investigated how sexual dimorphism and ontogeny interact with landscape structure to influence scale-dependent resource selection. Specifically, we sought to determine how these demographic factors mediate spatial trade-offs between optimal foraging habitats, top-down intraguild predation risk, and bottom-up severe winter weather.
Methods
We examined the spatial ecology of a solitary carnivore, the bobcat ( Lynx rufus ), across a heterogeneous, human-modified landscape in northern Minnesota, USA. Using spatial data derived from harvested adult and juvenile individuals, we evaluated multi-scale selection relative to land cover, structural ecotones, intraguild predator activity, and winter severity.
Results
Habitat selection was scale-dependent and partitioned demographically. Whereas bobcats universally selected for ecotones and avoided homogeneous open habitats at fine scales, responses to other features diverged by sex and age. Females actively avoided areas with high coyote activity and freezing temperatures; males exhibited high risk tolerance, apparently indifferent to coyote activity and tolerant of freezing temperatures. We identified a distinct ontogenetic spatial shift among females. Subordinate juveniles were competitively excluded from optimal natural ecotones, forcing them into riskier, anthropogenic agricultural edges. In contrast, adult females optimized foraging opportunities by selecting productive ecotones at the intersection of woody vegetation and semi-natural grasslands.
Conclusions
Our findings demonstrate that habitat selection is not a static species-level trait, but instead a dynamic process resulting from the interaction between ontogeny, sex, and landscape heterogeneity. The reliance of vulnerable demographic groups on marginal or anthropogenic habitats highlights how human land-use changes can inadvertently produce ecological winners and losers within the same species. Consequently, landscape management and conservation planning for solitary carnivores must shift from broad, population-wide habitat prescriptions to strategies that explicitly accommodate the divergent spatial requirements of specific demographic cohorts.
