A student made MOOC for medical students during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

(1) Antecedentes: América Latina fue una de las últimas regiones del mundo en verse afectada por la pandemia de COVID-19. Como respuesta a la emergencia, se implementó la educación virtual en casi todos los países de la región. (2) Métodos: Se realizó un curso en línea abierto masivo (MOOC) sobre epilepsia utilizando solo software y plataformas de acceso abierto, siguiendo las competencias de la Liga Internacional contra la Epilepsia para la enseñanza de la epileptología. (3) Resultados: 250 estudiantes de salud de 8 países latinoamericanos diferentes se inscribieron en el curso y solo el 17.2 (%) de ellos habían participado previamente en cursos como este. Este curso tuvo una tasa de finalización de 37.2 (%) y, de los estudiantes que completaron el curso, 98.3 (%) participaría en cursos como este en el futuro. (4) Conclusión: los MOOC se pueden implementar fácilmente como una estrategia pedagógica poderosa durante la pandemia de COVID-19 y pueden tener un impacto positivo no solo en sus objetivos de aprendizaje propuestos, sino que pueden ayudar a cerrar la brecha que impide que los estudiantes de salud latinoamericanos adquieran activamente conocimiento a través de ellos.

(1) Background: Latin America was one of the last regions of the world to become affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. As a response to the emergency, virtual education was implemented in almost every country of the region. (2) Methods: A massive open online course about epilepsy was made using only open access software and platforms following the international league against epilepsy competence-based domains for epileptology teaching. (3) Results: 250 healthcare students from 8 different Latin American countries enrolled in the course and only 17.2(%) of them had previously participated in courses like this one. This course had a completion rate of 37.2(%) and, of the students that completed the course, 98.3(%) would participate in course like this in the future. (4) Conclusion: In conclusion, MOOCs can be easily implemented as a powerful pedagogic strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic and can have a positive impact not only in in its proposed learning objectives but it can help in closing the gap that prevent Latin American healthcare students to acquire actively knowledge trough them.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.07.05.20146654: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.