Factors affecting mortality for the novel coronavirus infection in different regions of the Russian Federation

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Abstract

Background. The influence of such factors as population density, practices for testing for the SARS-CoV-2 (combined with quarantine/self-isolation for infected individuals and their contacts) and ambient temperature on the spread of the novel coronavirus infection and related mortality in the 85 different regions of the Russian Federation isn’t well characterized.Materials and methods. Population density in the different regions of the Russian Federation is measured as the number of persons per square kilometer of settled areas; ambient temperature is measured as the mean for January and July values; practices for testing for SARS-CoV-2 are characterized via case-fatality rates (the percent of deaths among cases with known outcome (recovered + fatal)) — under more active testing for SARSCoV-2, greater numbers of mild/moderate cases of infection are detected, resulting in the decline in case-fatality rates, i.e. the intensity of testing is inversely proportional to the case-fatality rate.Results. The correlation between population density and rates of mortality for COVID-19 per 100,000 persons on November 22, 2020 in the 85 different regions of the Russian Federation is 0.53 (0.36; 0.67); the correlation between case-fatality rates and rates of mortality for COVID-19 per 100,000 persons on Nov. 22, 2020 in the different regions of the Russian Federation is 0.62 (0.47; 0.74). Results of the linear regression suggest a positive association between population density, as well as case-fatality rates and rates of mortality for COVID-19 in the different regions of Russia, and a negative association between ambient temperature and rates of mortality for the novel coronavirus infection.Conclusions. Lower population density, more active testing for SARS-CoV-2 and higher ambient temperature are associated with lower rates of mortality for COVID-19. In particular, additional measures should be implemented towards testing of different categories of individuals for SARS-CoV-2, including those seeking testing on their own initiative, those seeking medical help with respiratory symptoms, and contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.09.18.20197194: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.