LPWAN Technologies for IoT: Real-World Deployment Performance and Practical Comparison

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Low Power Wide Area Networks (LPWAN) have emerged as essential connectivity solutions for the Internet of Things (IoT), addressing requirements for long range, energy efficient communication that traditional wireless technologies cannot meet. With LPWAN connections projected to grow at 26% compound annual growth rate until 2027, understanding real-world performance is crucial for technology selection. This review examines four leading LPWAN technologies—LoRaWAN, Sigfox, Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT), and LTE-M. This review analyzes 20 peer reviewed studies from 2015–2025 reporting real-world deployment metrics across power consumption, range, data rate, scalability, availability, and security. Across these studies, practical performance diverges from vendor specifications. In the cited rural and urban LoRaWAN deployments LoRaWAN achieves 2+ year battery life and 11 km rural range but suffers collision limitations above 1000 devices per gateway. Sigfox demonstrates exceptional range (280 km record) with minimal power consumption but remains constrained by 12 byte payloads and security vulnerabilities. NB-IoT provides robust performance with 96–100% packet delivery ratios at −127 dBm on the tested commercial networks, and supports tens of thousands devices per cell, though mobility increases energy consumption. In the cited trials LTE-M offers highest throughput and sub 200 ms latency but fails beyond −113 dBm where NB-IoT maintains connectivity. NB-IoT emerges optimal for large scale stationary deployments, while LTE-M suits high throughput mobile applications.

Article activity feed