Primary Care Records and Population Prevalence of Chronic Insomnia: Do They Match?

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Chronic insomnia is a prevalent condition with important health implications. However, its recognition in clinical practice is often limited. This study evaluated the alignment between population-based estimates of chronic insomnia and the prevalence recorded in primary care, assessing the diagnostic reliability of healthcare services. Design: We conducted a comparative cross-sectional analysis using two independent data sources: (1) the Epidemiology Study of Insomnia in Spain (EPINSOM) survey, which applied the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Third Edition (ICSD-3), criteria to a representative sample of the Spanish adult population (n = 2243; Catalonia subsample n = 363) and (2) the SIDIAP Electronic Health Record (EHR) database, comprising anonymized primary care data from adults in Catalonia (N = 4,131,754). Methods: Prevalence estimates of insomnia symptoms, chronic insomnia syndrome, and chronic insomnia disorder were extracted from the EPINSOM survey and compared with ICD-10-coded insomnia diagnoses in the SIDIAP. Pairwise comparisons of proportions were conducted using z-tests for independent samples. For transparency, 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the Wilson method. Results: In Catalonia, the population-based prevalence of chronic insomnia disorder was 13.6% (95% CI: 10.1–17.1), whereas the prevalence of coded insomnia diagnoses in primary care was significantly lower at 5.1% (95% CI: 5.08–5.12). Among adults aged ≥55 years, the prevalence estimates were more closely aligned between the survey (18.2%) and SIDIAP records (18.5%). The survey-derived prevalence of insomnia symptoms reached 41.39% (95% CI: 39.2–43.6), highlighting substantial underrecognition in clinical practice. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that primary care insomnia diagnoses substantially underestimate insomnia prevalence compared with ICSD-3-based population estimates, particularly in younger adults. While diagnoses appear to be more like to prevalence in older adults (>55 years), this discrepancy highlights the need for improved identification and management of insomnia in primary care settings, especially among younger populations who may be underdiagnosed.

Article activity feed