Evaluating modelling decisions and spatial predictions in ecosystem mapping

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Ecosystem maps support a vast array of applications in conservation, land management and policy. The capacity of an ecosystem map to support these applications is determined by its ability to accurately represent ecosystem distributions, which is heavily influenced by the model used to produce them. Here, we evaluated the influence of key modelling decisions made whilst developing a new and comprehensive ecosystem map using a recently developed ecosystem typology for the remote Tiwi Islands, Australia. We collated a reference set of training points from diverse datasets and employed a pixel-based, random forest model to classify and predict ecosystem distributions. We tested decisions at three stages of the model formulation. First, we tested the number of classes by aggregating ecosystem types (finest scale, n = 11) into functional groups (n = 10) and biomes (coarsest, n = 8) according to the Global Ecosystem Typology. Second, we compared data acquired from the Sentinel-2 satellite using the MSI sensor and Landsat-9 with the OLI-2 sensor. Finally, we tested covariates from satellite image bands only or satellite imagery combined with additional covariates describing other ecological characteristics. We evaluated these decisions using a range of model performance metrics, including overall, by-class and spatially explicit estimates. Our study found that using covariates additional to those from satellite images improved all evaluation metrics for all model decisions. Acquisitions from Landsat-9 tended to improve model performance over Sentinel-2, although the effect was variable. Developing maps at the biome scale (coarsest resolution) slightly improved overall performance but hinders applications that need to differentiate between ecosystem types. Including additional relevant covariates or considering alternative satellites are better options for improving map performance than simplifying the classes. Producing spatially explicit evaluation of ecosystem maps is a rapid and achievable method to communicate limitations and support users to make informed decisions.

Article activity feed