Reconciling the Sex Recession Debate: Male Exclusion and Reporting Bias in Two National Surveys
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Prior studies of young adult sexlessness reached conflicting conclusions: GSS-based analyses found rising male sexlessness, while NSFG-based studies found no male-specific trend. This study reconciles these through three innovations: (1) distinguishing virginity (symmetric rise) from dry spells among experienced adults (gender-divergent); (2) identifying a 2017-2019 NSFG measurement anomaly via stock analysis; and (3) documenting male distributional polarization (moderate-middle collapse). Difference-in-differences show GSS sexlessness gap widening 10.6 pp (p = .024) and NSFG dry spells 6.2 pp (p = .014) for 18-24 year-olds post2012. Stock measure analysis and digit heaping confirm reporting bias in the anomalous wave (p < .001). CPS validation reveals parallel male singlehood acceleration (+0.49 pp/year slope change, p = .003). Age falsification concentrates effects in app-exposed cohorts. Independent validation from CPS relationship-status data—free of sexual reporting bias—shows a parallel post-2012 acceleration in male singlehood.