The Resilience-Support Paradox: Multilevel Analysis of Differentiated Support for Academic Resilience

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

This study challenges the universal assumption that a supportive school climate is the key to academic resilience for disadvantaged students. Using a methodologically rigorous analysis of PISA 2022 data (N = 29,728), we uncover a 'Resilience-Support Paradox': in many education systems, resilient students report lower levels of perceived school support than their struggling peers. Our findings reveal that the most powerful predictor of resilience is not external support, but a student’s internal Math Disposition: a combination of self-efficacy, interest, and low anxiety. These results suggest that one-size-fits-all support systems may be ineffective or even counterproductive. We argue for a paradigm shift toward differentiated interventions that cultivate students' internal psychological assets, a goal uniquely achievable through the design of modern adaptive educational technologies.

Article activity feed