Timing effects in the association between childhood and adolescent bullying victimization with late adolescence and emerging adulthood depressive symptoms

Background: Bullying victimization during childhood is a significant risk factor for psychopathology, particularly depression, with some studies suggesting lasting associations into adulthood. However, these associations may vary based on developmental timing, i.e., age at exposure. Life course epidemiology proposes three timing hypotheses: (1) accumulation of risk, where additional exposure events increase impact; (2) recency, where proximal experiences have a greater impact than distal ones; and (3) sensitive periods, where specific timing windows increase vulnerability. These hypotheses have yet to be formally tested to better understand how the timing of bullying victimization affects depression in emerging adulthood. This study explores the relationship between the timing of bullying victimization and depression symptoms in late adolescence and emerging adulthood.Methods: Using data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (N = 6,782), we applied the Structured Life Course Modelling Approach (SLCMA) to test accumulation of risk, recency, and sensitive period hypotheses. Bullying was measured with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire at ages 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, and 16. Depression symptoms were measured with the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire at ages 16, 17, 21, 22, and 23. Sensitive periods were defined as early childhood (0–5 years), middle childhood (6–10 years), early adolescence (11–14 years), and late adolescence (15–17 years).Results: Model selection by SLCMA consistently favoured the recency hypothesis across outcome timepoints.Conclusions: Findings suggest that the association between bullying victimization and depressive symptoms is primarily driven by recency. Early intervention is essential to reduce later mental health consequences.