Impact of cash-out availability in a naturalistic betting task: A randomized experimental study

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background and Aims: People place larger bets on outcomes of risky events when they can settle their bet earlier – i.e., they are allowed to cash-out before the bet concludes. Using a naturalistic gambling task, the present study aims to determine how the opportunity to cash-out impacts the decision to bet and to assess the underlying association between cash-out availability and risk of gambling harm.Design and setting: We conducted an incentivised between-participants online experiment, where participants could place fixed-odds bets on the outcomes of pre-recorded horse races via an interface resembling a commercial bookmaker’s website. Participants were randomly assigned to conditions in which the cash-out was either available or not available to them and were given the option to gamble an endowment that they had previously earned in a real-effort task.Cases: 377 participants with experience in online sports betting were recruited from online research participation platform Prolific. Measurements: The decision to engage with the gambling task was recorded at 3 points during the experimental session. Stake sizes and implied win probabilities of placed bets were recorded. Risk of gambling harms was measured by administering the PGSI.Results: People in the cash-out-available group were more likely to choose the gambling task over a distractor (non-gambling) game (χ²(1, N=377)=4.59, p=0.032) and made larger bets when wagering than those in the no-cash-out group (W=19761.5, p=0.021). There was no effect of the manipulation on the average odds of bets placed (W=10635.5, p=0.67). No significant interactions with PGSI were observed for either stake size (β=-0.02, SE=0.02, p=0.15) nor the implied win probability of placed bets (β<0.01, SE<0.01, p=0.44). Participants in the cash-out-available group engaged with the gambling task for longer than participants in the no-cash-out group (β=0.65, SE=0.23, p=0.0047). Conclusions: The provision of cash-out options in horse race betting results in significant changes in betting behaviour. These behaviours can lead to gambling harms, pointing towards the potential risks of the cash-out option.

Article activity feed