Operationalizing Childhood Adversity to Predict Delinquency: Comparing Single Adversity, Cumulative Risk, and Latent Class Approaches
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background: Juvenile delinquency remains a major concern, with childhood adversity recognized as an important risk factor. While research links childhood adversity to delinquency, less is known about how different operationalizations of adversity compare in predicting delinquency. Many studies overlook key features of adversity, such as its type, accumulation, timing, and chronicity. Objective: This study addresses these gaps by comparing three approaches to operationalizing childhood adversity: individual adversities, a cumulative adversity score, and latent class analysis, and examining their associations with delinquency. Participants and Setting: Data were drawn from the Millennium Cohort Study, a large, nationally representative longitudinal sample of young people in the UK (N=9,980). Methods: Structural equation modelling was employed to assess the associations between the three adversity operationalizations and delinquency. Results: Our findings show that, when operationalized as individual adversities, maternal substance misuse and exposure to school and street violence were the strongest predictors of delinquency. Latent class analysis identified nine distinct groups, including those characterized by low adolescent adversity, persistent deprivation and low adolescent adversity, maternal substance misuse, and high overall adversity. These groups showed significant associations with delinquency. The cumulative adversity scores were also positively associated with delinquency. Conclusions: Overall, the findings highlight that young people exposed to adversity during adolescence or to chronic adversities are particularly vulnerable to engaging in delinquency. Importantly, each approach to operationalizing adversity offered unique insights, demonstrating how our understanding of the relationship between childhood adversity and delinquency can differ depending on how adversity is conceptualized and assessed.