Comparative life cycle evaluation of alternative fuels for a futuristic subsonic long-range aircraft

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Liquid hydrogen (LH2) and 100% synthetic paraffinic kerosene (SPK), or sustainable aviation fuel, are promising substitutes for traditional Jet-A fuel in long-haul aviation, as long as they are produced through processes that result in net-zero well-to-wake (WTWa) emissions. This research assesses the WTWa environmental performance, including non-CO2 effects, of a blended wing body aircraft (with a capacity of 300 passengers and a range of 13,890 km) operating on either LH2 or 100% SPK. The study uses the GREET model to evaluate both fuel production and in-flight emissions. Reviewing over 100 different fuel production methods, the analysis finds that LH2 can reach net-zero or even negative WTWa CO2-equivalent emissions if generated from biomass or via fermentation methods paired with carbon capture. Non-CO2 emissions are shown to play a substantial role in overall climate impact. When miscanthus is used as the biomass feedstock, 100% SPK can cut WTWa CO2-equivalent emissions by 70–85% compared to Jet-A. A broader supply analysis suggests that by 2050, hydrogen and SAF production could be sufficient to meet the energy needs of long-haul aviation, assuming a 4% yearly growth in air traffic and complete transition to these alternative fuels. These results offer important direction for future research, cost assessments, and policy-making aimed at decarbonizing long-haul aviation.

Article activity feed