Data in Brief: Comparative Life Cycle Evaluation of Alternative Fuels for a Futuristic Subsonic Long-Range Aircraft

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Liquid hydrogen (LH2) and 100% synthetic paraffinic kerosene (SPK), or sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), offer promising low-emission alternatives to conventional Jet-A fuel for long-distance flights—assuming they are produced through processes that support net-zero well-to-wake (WTWa) emissions. This study assesses the WTWa performance, including non-CO₂ effects, of a blended wing body aircraft designed to carry 300 passengers over a range of 13,890 km, using either LH2 or 100% SPK. The analysis quantifies emissions during the operational phase and evaluates fuel production impacts using the GREET model. Results from over 100 fuel production pathways show that LH2 can deliver net-zero or even negative WTWa CO₂-equivalent emissions when derived from biomass or produced via integrated fermentation combined with carbon capture and storage. Non-CO₂ emissions are found to be a major contributor to overall climate impacts. Using miscanthus as a feedstock, 100% SPK reduces WTWa CO₂-equivalent emissions by 70–85% relative to Jet-A. A high-level supply assessment suggests that by 2050, production of SAF and hydrogen could satisfy the energy needs of long-haul aviation, assuming a 4% annual increase in air traffic and widespread adoption of these alternative fuels. These findings offer valuable direction for future research, cost assessments, and policy-making aimed at enabling sustainable long-haul air travel.

Article activity feed