Bridging Detection Gaps in Oil and Gas Methane Inventories: Integrating Vehicle-Based to Aerial-Based and OGI Surveys
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Methane emissions from the upstream oil and gas sector are a significant contributor to global methane emissions. Optical gas imaging (OGI) is widely used in regulatory leak-detection and repair (LDAR) programs in this sector, yet recent studies have found that OGI identifies only a fraction of site-level emissions compared to aerial-based measurement methods. There is a growing need for technological intercomparisons to better understand the strengths and limitations of different measurement methods in real-world field conditions, to inform their application in both LDAR and emission inventory development. In this study we compared vehicle-based, aerial-based, and quantitative OGI measurements at 302 sites in the Sundre region in Alberta, Canada. The vehicle-based system had the highest detection frequencies at 70% followed by aerial-based at 28% and OGI at only 12%. The vehicle-based system (0.017–32.2 kg/h) was also more sensitive than OGI (0.17–29.6 kg/h) and aerial-based (0.28–41 kg/h), capturing 72% of the emissions < 1kg/h, far more than the other methods, while aerial-based measurements identified higher total site-level emissions, particularly from site with many tall sources. Using a measurement-based inventory incorporating all three technologies, we found that each technology on its own is likely to underestimate total emissions – most significantly OGI at 29% of the total inventory, followed by vehicle-based (44%) and aerial-based (66%). These findings suggest that OGI misses a substantial fraction of emitting sites and total emissions. While this technology is valuable for identifying specific leaking components, it is less effective for site-level screening or for filling gaps in the low-level emission distribution. Aerial-based surveys similarly miss the low end of the emission distribution but are more effective at detecting and quantifying emissions from tall sources. Compared to OGI, the vehicle-based system was both more effective at finding emitting sites across a broader emission range and considerably faster, positioning it as a strong candidate for bridging the gap between component-level and aerial methane monitoring.