Evaluation of MicroSage: A Web-Based Clinical Reasoning Support Tool for Microbiology Education in Resource-Limited Settings - A Pilot Observational Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Clinical microbiology education traditionally presents organisms in isolation, without training students to reason from observable findings — such as gram stain results, infection site, patient age, and symptoms — toward a differential diagnosis. This gap leaves students underprepared for clinical laboratory reasoning. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy, usability, and educational utility of MicroSage, a freely accessible web-based educational clinical reasoning support tool designed to bridge the gap between instructive microbiology education and applied clinical reasoning. Methods: MicroSage was developed using a React frontend and Python FastAPI backend, incorporating a weighted multi-parameter scoring engine across 30 clinically relevant organisms and 6 infection sites. A cross-sectional validation study was conducted among undergraduate students, academic faculty (LifeScience department), and clinical laboratory professionals in Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. Results: A total of 40 participants were included. MicroSage achieved a primary accuracy of 77.5%, with all remaining cases demonstrating partial accuracy within the top three results. Conclusion: MicroSage represents a low-cost, accessible solution for microbiology education that supports clinical reasoning skill development. The tool is freely available at microsage.vercel.app and requires no installation.

Article activity feed