Neurogynaecology and Women’s Reproductive Health: A PRISMA Based Systematic Review of Neuroendocrine Regulation, Autonomic Dysfunction, Psychosomatic Stress, and Integrative Therapeutic Outcomes

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Neurogynecology is a rapidly evolving interdisciplinary field that elucidates bidirectional interactions between the nervous system and the female reproductive system. Disorders including polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), dysmenorrhea, endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain, and stress-related infertility are increasingly recognised as biopsychoneuroimmune conditions in which neuroendocrine dysregulation, autonomic imbalance, psychosomatic stress, and neuro-immune signaling function as central pathogenic mechanisms. Objectives To systematically synthesise evidence on neuro-gynaecological mechanisms, evaluate clinical correlations, and assess integrative therapeutic outcomes across key gynaecological conditions. Methods A PRISMA-guided systematic review was conducted. PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched using predefined Boolean operators. Peer-reviewed clinical, observational, experimental, neuroimaging, and psychosomatic studies published primarily between 2000 and 2026 were included, for neurological, neuroendocrine, autonomic, or psychosomatic relevance to gynaecological pathology. Results Eighty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. Four principal neuro-gynaecological pathogenic domains were identified: (1) HPA–HPO axis dysregulation mediating stress-induced reproductive suppression; (2) autonomic nervous system imbalance characterised by sympathetic hyperactivity and reduced vagal tone, measurable by heart rate variability; (3) psychosomatic stress driving central sensitisation and disproportionate pain perception; and (4) bidirectional neuro-immune crosstalk sustaining neurogenic inflammation in chronic pelvic conditions. Conclusion Gynaecological disorders represent complex, centrally driven biopsychoneuroimmune conditions requiring multidimensional diagnostic and therapeutic frameworks. Adopting an integrative neuro-gynaecological model has significant potential to improve diagnostic precision, reduce symptom chronicity, and deliver personalised, patient-centered women's healthcare. Neurogynecology is positioned to become an essential and standard pillar of modern gynaecological practice.

Article activity feed