Pull-Back Discriminants and Transversality Indices: Regime Boundary Jumps on Policy Manifolds
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Differential approaches to general equilibrium and related equilibrium systems represent equilibria as zeros of a residual equation F(p, x) = 0 and analyze the equilibrium correspondence through regularity and bifurcation properties on the primitive environment space X. In policy analysis, however, primitives are implemented by institutional instruments: a design parameter θ ranges over a policy manifold Θ and induces x = Φ(θ) through an implementation map Φ : Θ → X shaped by legal, administrative, or engineering constraints. This framework transfers the analysis of regime boundaries from the primitive space X to the policy-side geometry of Θ. We develop an ideal-theoretic formulation of policy-side regime boundaries by pulling back the discriminant locus D ⊂ X to the pull-back boundary BΘ = Φ−1(D) ⊂ Θ, thereby constructing a boundary atlas explicitly decomposed by mechanism via pull-back of discriminant ideals and their componentwise decompositions. To quantify whether boundary-jump classifications along policy paths are structurally robust transversal hits or perturbation-sensitive (grazing), we introduce a componentwise transversality index TIk ∈ [0, 1] defined via normal spaces to each boundary component, in a generator-independent manner. Our main results are: (i) a pull-back discriminant theorem transporting mechanism-specific boundary decompositions from X to Θ; (ii) a transversalhit stability theorem establishing robustness of boundary-jump classification under positive transversality; and (iii) a grazing instability theorem showing that near-tangential contacts yield intrinsically fragile jump classification. Two economic illustrations complement the theory: a motivating generalequilibrium demonstration where distinct mechanisms can share the same rank-loss signature, and a minimal two-cell economy with posted-price instruments in which Φ and two boundary mechanisms are explicit and TI heatmaps visualise where boundary separation is reliable or fragile. MSC (2020): 91B50; 58A15; 58K40; 13P10; 14Q20. JEL classification: C60; C61; D51; D78.