Second-line antiretroviral therapy success rates and predictors among people living with HIV in Rwanda, 2019-2023

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Despite advances in HIV treatment, managing people living with HIV (PLHIV) on second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) remains challenging. Globally, second-line ART achieves an average viral suppression rate (VLS) of 81.2%. In Rwanda, evidence is limited; the most recent national study in 2016 reported a 17% failure rate. This study assessed current VLS proportions and predictors of second-line ART success in Rwanda. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted across 277 health facilities, including PLHIV who transitioned to second-line ART between January 2019 and December 2023. Data were abstracted from patient files using a standardized tool. Descriptive statistics summarized profiles, and multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of VLS, defined as viral load < 1000 copies/mL. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Rwanda Institutional Review Board. Results Analysis included 726 individuals. Overall, VLS was 88.8%. Time from first-line failure to second-line initiation ranged 0–14 months (median: 5; IQR: 3–9). Most were female (63.9%), aged 35–49 years (38.7%), on protease inhibitor-based regimens (78.7%), and over 10 years on ART (71.7%). At switch, 83.2% had viral load ≥ 10,000 copies/mL. Compared to < 15 years, individuals aged 35–49 (aOR = 3.07; 95% CI: 1.07–8.11) and ≥ 50 (aOR = 3.31; 95% CI: 1.08–9.52) had higher odds of VLS. Residence in Northern (aOR = 2.67; 95% CI: 1.15–6.94) and Southern Provinces (aOR = 2.82; 95% CI: 1.25–7.05) predicted greater suppression than Eastern Province. Poor/moderate adherence (20%) reduced odds by 74% (aOR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.15–0.43), and substance use (13.4%) reduced odds by 60% (aOR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.21–0.79). No significant difference was observed between PI-based (89.0%) and DTG-based regimens (88.4%; p = 0.953). Youth aged 15–24 (80.5%) and students (75.6%) had lower, though nonsignificant, suppression. Conclusion Rwanda’s second-line VLS of 88.8% exceeds the global average and improves on the 2016 estimate but remains below the UNAIDS 95% target. Targeted interventions addressing adherence, substance use, and regional disparities are needed. Tailored youth-friendly care, peer support, and integrated mental health services should be prioritized to improve outcomes among younger populations.

Article activity feed