Clinical significance of the COPD Assessment Test in evaluating treatment response in Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background In Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD), sputum culture conversion is a key treatment endpoint but does not fully reflect symptom burden. We evaluated the clinical utility of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) as a patient-reported measure of disease severity and treatment response in MAC-PD. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 179 treatment courses in 174 patients with MAC-PD treated with guideline-based therapy at a single center. CAT scores were assessed at treatment initiation (CAT-Base) and at 6 and 12 months (Δ6 and Δ12). Associations between CAT-Base, baseline chest CT score, and baseline sputum culture status were examined. We evaluated whether Δ6 and Δ12 discriminated 12-month sputum culture status and overall treatment control, defined by radiological response at 12 months and microbiological course up to 24 months post-treatment initiation. Results CAT-Base was associated with baseline chest CT score and was higher in baseline sputum culture-positive and poorly-controlled treatment courses. Neither Δ6 nor Δ12 discriminated 12-month sputum culture status. However, Δ12 was more favorable in well-controlled than poorly-controlled treatment courses and demonstrated modest discriminatory ability (area under the curve (AUC) 0.646), which improved in treatment courses with CAT-Base > 2 (AUC 0.682). In this subgroup, a Δ12 cut-off of − 3 yielded a specificity of 71.9% and a positive predictive value 85.5% for identifying well-controlled disease. Conclusions CAT-Base reflects radiological severity and microbiological status in MAC-PD. In treatment courses with CAT-Base > 2, a 3-point CAT decrease at 12 months may help identify well-controlled disease, representing a pragmatic candidate threshold for clinically meaningful symptomatic improvement. Clinical trial number: not applicable.