Pressure–Resilience Dynamics of Land Systems under Intensified Anthropogenic Load: A Spatial Assessment Framework for Sustainable Land Management

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Intensified anthropogenic pressure and industrial disturbance increasingly alter land systems by modifying land-use structure, degrading soil–water interactions, and reducing ecosystem service capacity. These processes challenge conventional environmental assessment approaches, particularly where monitoring systems are fragmented or incomplete. This study develops a spatial land-system assessment framework based on pressure–resilience dynamics to evaluate regional differentiation of environmental risks. Technogenic pressure is conceptualized as a composite indicator reflecting land-use intensity, industrial load, and contamination affecting soil, water, and atmospheric components. Ecosystem resilience represents the integrated buffering capacity of atmosphere–hydrosphere–pedosphere–biota subsystems within regional land systems. Anthropo-ecological risk is formalized as an interaction term, enabling differentiation of territories with comparable land-use pressure but contrasting adaptive capacity. A radiological dimension is included to capture spatial variability associated with legacy contamination and nuclear infrastructure. Using open-access national geospatial datasets, the framework integrates normalized environmental indicators within a unified spatial workflow. Principal component and cluster analyses identify four land-system typologies: high-pressure low-resilience industrial systems; transitional systems with moderate buffering capacity; radiological–mixed risk systems; and stable–resilient systems with low pressure and strong ecological buffering potential. The dominant spatial gradient is governed by pressure–resilience interaction, while radiological risk represents a partially independent dimension. The findings demonstrate that land-system vulnerability cannot be inferred from land-use intensity alone but emerges from structured interactions between anthropogenic pressure and ecosystem resilience. The proposed framework advances land system science by formalizing pressure–resilience dynamics as a core analytical principle and provides a transparent screening-level tool for spatial planning, sustainable land management, and resilience-oriented regional development under conditions of environmental stress and data uncertainty.

Article activity feed