Small-scale farmers critical to curbing deforestation linked to forest-risk commodities

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Deforestation remains a critical challenge despite increasing global attention. Voluntary and market-based initiatives have proven insufficient to reverse this trend. In response, the European Union introduced the Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), requiring information for several forest-risk commodities (e.g., palm oil, soy, rubber, cocoa, and coffee) to enforce deforestation-free standards across these supply chains. With agriculture driving an estimated 86% of global deforestation, a major obstacle to reversing this trend is the limited understanding of farmers operating in forested landscapes. Most existing agri-food system models evaluate deforestation risk at the national scale, overlooking differences between landholding types, limiting targeted policy insights. Here, we evaluate how different farm sizes contribute to the production of EUDR-listed crops within forested landscapes, using spatial datasets on crop distribution, forest cover, and farm size. We find that small-scale farms (<2 ha) are responsible for a large share of forest-linked production: 91% for rubber, 81% for palm oil, 53% for coffee, and 60% for cocoa. These crops are produced mainly in countries where traceability and compliance pose major challenges. In contrast, soybean production in forested areas is dominated by large-scale farms. We identify regions where smallholders may face high risks of exclusion from EU supply chains due to EUDR compliance across Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand, and Côte d’Ivoire. These findings highlight the need for targeted support to smallholders in these countries, including investment in data collection, certification systems, and land tenure security. Our findings also reveal a misalignment between the EUDR’s country benchmarking classification and actual deforestation exposure, indicating that the current country classification approach of the EUDR needs revision.

Article activity feed