Institutional Transformation of the Saudi Health System (2020– 2025): A Qualitative Policy Analysis of Governance, Financing, and System Resilience
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background Health systems globally are undergoing structural reconfiguration driven by demographic ageing, chronic disease burdens, fiscal sustainability pressures, and post-pandemic governance reassessment. Contemporary reform paradigms increasingly emphasise governance differentiation, strategic purchasing, primary health care (PHC) strengthening, and digital integration as systemic stabilisers. Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 health sector transformation represents one of the most accelerated centrally coordinated reform trajectories in a high-income context. However, integrated institutional evaluation of governance restructuring and its resilience implications remains limited. Methods This study employed a qualitative institutional policy analysis covering the period 2020–2025. Using a structured analytical framework, the Accelerated Centralised Reform Model (ACRM) reform was evaluated across four domains: governance restructuring, financing, and strategic purchasing, PHC strengthening, and digital transformation. Data sources included peer-reviewed scholarship, OECD and WHO governance frameworks, and publicly available reform documentation. Institutional coding was applied across structural differentiation, incentive realignment, accountability consolidation, and adaptive governance integration dimensions. Results Findings demonstrate substantial structural differentiation between regulatory, purchasing, and provider functions; expansion of performance-linked financing mechanisms; strategic reorientation towards PHC-based service delivery; and rapid digital platform deployment. Reform design aligns conceptually with contemporary governance paradigms. However, implementation depth varies across accountability standardisation, analytic purchasing maturity, workforce alignment, and adaptive feedback integration. Conclusions Saudi Arabia’s reform illustrates how accelerated centrally coordinated restructuring can achieve rapid institutional convergence with modern governance models. Long-term system resilience depends on consolidating performance transparency, strengthening analytic purchasing capacity, embedding adaptive governance routines, and institutionalising iterative evaluation cycles. The study contributes to comparative health policy scholarship by conceptualising accelerated centralised reform as a distinct institutional trajectory.