Risk of Hepatitis B Reactivation Among HBsAg-Negative, Anti-HBc–Positive Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a potential complication in HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc–positive patients receiving immunosuppressive cancer therapy. However, real-world evidence describing reactivation risk in breast cancer populations—particularly in the context of modern systemic regimens—is limited. Methods We conducted Two-center retrospective cohort study of HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc–positive breast cancer patients treated with systemic chemotherapy or targeted agents between 2018 and 2024 in Türkiye. Patients receiving antiviral prophylaxis were excluded. Demographic, oncologic, and virological data—including baseline anti-HBs titers and available serial HBV DNA measurements—were collected. HBV reactivation was defined using international criteria. Results Among 139 eligible patients (mean age 60.1 years), 89.2% were anti-HBs–positive at baseline. Anthracycline-based regimens were administered to 65.5% of the cohort. HBV reactivation occurred in one patient (0.7%; 95% CI, 0.02–3.94%), who lacked protective anti-HBs antibodies and received anthracycline-containing therapy. No reactivations were observed among patients treated with taxanes, HER2-directed agents, CDK4/6 inhibitors, or platinum regimens. Because HBV DNA monitoring was not uniformly performed, subclinical or asymptomatic reactivation events may have been underdetected. Conclusion HBV reactivation was uncommon in this real-world breast cancer cohort, and the single event occurred in a patient with established risk factors. These findings support guideline-aligned, risk-adapted monitoring rather than universal antiviral prophylaxis. However, the low number of events and nonstandardized virological follow-up warrant cautious interpretation and highlight the need for prospective studies using uniform HBV DNA surveillance.

Article activity feed