Effectiveness and tolerability of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) in people with HIV (PWH) in routine clinical practice in Türkiye: 12-month outcomes from the KLIMIK HIV- TR cohort

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Phase 3 trials have established the long‑term efficacy and safety of BIC/FTC/TAF for both treatment‑naïve and treatment‑experienced people with HIV (PWH). Real‑world evidence in patients with very high baseline viral load remains limited. Methods This was a non‑interventional, observational, retrospective analysis across 33 tertiary centers participating in the KLIMIK HIV‑TR cohort. Adults (≥18 years) who initiated single‑tablet BIC/FTC/TAF on or before August 31, 2022 were included. The primary endpoint was virologic suppression at week‑48, defined as HIV‑1 RNA <200 copies/mL. Suppression was further stratified by baseline viral load (<100,000; >100,000; >1,000,000 copies/mL). Results 2,262 patients were analyzed (1,122 treatment‑naïve [49.6%], 1,140 treatment‑experienced [50.4%]). Among treatment‑naïve patients, 88.5% had baseline HIV‑1 RNA >100,000 copies/mL and 24.2% >1,000,000 copies/mL; 55.7% had CD4 <350 cells/mm³. Virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL) in treatment‑naïve patients was 95.6% and 98.3% at weeks 24 and 48 respectively. When a threshold of <50 copies/mL was used, virological suppression rates at weeks 24 and 48 were 81.9% and 93%, respectively. At week 24, virological suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) was lower in those with baseline HIV‑1 RNA >100,000 versus <100,000 copies/mL (80.4% vs 93.8%; p<0.001), and lower in those with baseline HIV‑1 RNA >1,000,000 versus <1,000,000 copies/mL (67.1% vs 86.9%; p<0.001). The median CD4/CD8 ratio increased from 0.44 at baseline to 1.06 at week 48 (p<0.001). No serious adverse events leading to discontinuation were observed. Conclusions High efficacy was observed even among treatment‑naïve patients with very high baseline viral loads, supporting its use in this population.

Article activity feed